FanLib V2.0?
Nov. 13th, 2009 06:38 pmSeveral people (not me) have received invitations to nominate fic on a new site, Words On The Wind, which purports to be a fanfic awards site, for fanwork in paranormal fandoms.
If you go over and click around, you'll notice a couple odd things:
1) It doesn't seem to have a connection to any known fandom entity.
2) There's no "about" section.
3) The graphics on the site are referencing an erratic hodge-podge of fandoms - the largest picture, for example, is from Ghost Whisperer -- but there's no graphic from Supernatural. Which seems like a bizarre omission for a site whose mandate is to run award nominations for fics from paranormal fandoms.
4) Comments have been turned off on all entries (it's running on Wordpress, so parts of it are nominally bloggish)
5) The only way to get in touch with the maintainers is to use forms -- there aren't any email addresses associated with the site. (I read through the source code too, just to check.)
When comments were still turned on on the entry called "Week 1 Update", I left a short, two-sentence comment (linking to my livejournal site) asking who Words On The Wind was, and what their fandom connection was. I mentioned that after FanLib, I was wary of participating in stuff that appeared from nowhere.
My comment got deleted an hour later. The mod didn't contact me at the email address I left, either.
So. Who's got more deets? I admit to being overvigilant against FanLib-esque incursions, but hey, there's a reason we don't like those guys.
ETA: Go go gadget fandom! A mere couple hours later,
We also found out that the domain name for Words On The Wind is registered to an individual, not a corporation, and that the email account used to register it has been deleted.
In addition, I've heard from a couple of people who were approached and asked if they would let their fic stand for nomination (some of them did, some of them didn't). I find this comforting vis a vis checking the site's bonafides, because it means that the site was following award protocol and wasn't just, you know, linking to all and sundry in an attempt to get traffic.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 12:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 12:43 am (UTC)With this one, I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 12:26 am (UTC)It's just weird. IDEK.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:00 am (UTC)My nose still says corporate, though. It's on a standalone paid domain (wouldn't fandom people opt for the free choice, most of the time? or make it branch out of their own, personal website?), and Ghost Whisperer is the largest graphic. Which makes no sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:08 am (UTC)And this is her fic comm: http://community.livejournal.com/gabbysfics/profile (Gabrielle Channing is clearly a pen name, so I don't feel bad about passing it around)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:48 am (UTC)It looks like she does or used to run a whole lot of other stuff- claiming comms, prompt comms, and the like- in a whole bunch of fandoms. I think she used to write, too, but after 2007 I'm only finding RPGs and fic awards. I think she also just opened a new journal at Vox.
And, JSYK, I am having way too much fun with this.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:13 am (UTC)Really, it was all google and WHOIS. People don't know how much information they leave lying around.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:19 am (UTC)But, really, she didn't make any sort of real effort to keep them separate, which made it easier. But that's a suspicious amount of mess to have to go through just to find out who runs an awards site.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 02:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 04:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 04:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-14 01:18 am (UTC)