Well-played, Maureen Ryan.
Nov. 9th, 2009 01:12 amMaureen Ryan publishes a review of SGU, in which she says she is disappointed.
Brad Wright comments, publicly, on a different review of Ryan's (for V, in which she references SGU). He probably doesn't realize that he comes across as condescending and rather without adequate argument.
Ryan responds to his comment with a thoughtful, considered, more in-depth discussion of SGU's shortcomings and what her hopes for it had been, and tells him not to worry about her talking about it again, because she's done.
I feel that Brad Wright is treating the word sexist like some people treat the word racist: that is, he's vehemently denying it applies to his work, not because it doesn't, but because he understands that people dislike things that are sexist.
IN SUM - SGU: a show I may frequently be found not watching. In fact, I can be found not watching it right now.
Brad Wright comments, publicly, on a different review of Ryan's (for V, in which she references SGU). He probably doesn't realize that he comes across as condescending and rather without adequate argument.
Ryan responds to his comment with a thoughtful, considered, more in-depth discussion of SGU's shortcomings and what her hopes for it had been, and tells him not to worry about her talking about it again, because she's done.
I feel that Brad Wright is treating the word sexist like some people treat the word racist: that is, he's vehemently denying it applies to his work, not because it doesn't, but because he understands that people dislike things that are sexist.
IN SUM - SGU: a show I may frequently be found not watching. In fact, I can be found not watching it right now.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-10 11:10 pm (UTC)(You should post your write-up at unfunnybusiness, by the way. Unless you're one of those morally opposed to the fandom_wank-esque comms, in which case I withdraw the suggestion.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-11 03:37 am (UTC)What's unfunny business? Where's it hosted? I have no moral objections to stuff like fandom_wank, but I don't feel I know enough about SGU to start doing write-ups of the press it's getting.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-12 06:12 pm (UTC)It's founding principles are here.
I think the ideal is for it to be a place where people can post stuff that sounds like fandom_wank, but isn't actually funny because of racism, sexism and so forth. However, it ends up mostly being a place where people post news articles what made them crazy.
Anyway, this post of yours could be pretty much pasted verbatim over there. You don't really have to do a "write-up." (For example, this post is only one sentence.)